Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01057
Original file (PD2012 01057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xx         BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS
CASE NUMBER: PD
1201057   SEPARATION DATE: 20011115
BOARD DATE: 20130326


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E3 (3042/Supply Clerk), medically separated for right thigh liposarcoma. The CI underwent surgical removal of a right thigh mass, myxoid liposarcoma, in August 1999. Despite radiation therapy, he could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or meet physical fitness standards. After determining that the loss of muscle mass and effects of radiation therapy were permanent, the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) forwarded Stage II, liposarcoma (myxoid) of the right medial thigh and no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the right thigh liposarcoma condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and he was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: I believe my right leg is in worse condition than previously believed the bend in my right leg is limited; the weakness of the leg is now affecting the left leg, by having to overcompensate for the weakness in the right. I now have arthritis in both knees. The right leg has scar tissue and a new condition that developed because of the radiation I received in my cancer treatment. My right leg is limited not only in its flexibility, but it limits my standing, stooping, and squatting, and other daily activities that I do. I also applied for loss of hearing when I got out, which I also believe should be reviewed. I also have sleep apnea, which at the time of my enlistment, I did not know I had. I can provide letters from my roommates in Japan & North Carolina which could verify my sleep condition.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The left leg, bilateral knee arthritis, loss of hearing, and sleep apnea conditions are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – Dated 20010926
VA (<1 Month Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20011116
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Pathologic T2ANXMO G-3, Stage II, Liposarcoma (Myxoid) of the Medial Thigh with Residual Weakness of Thigh Muscles 5012-8526-5314 10% Right Leg Liposarcoma 7899-7818 10% 20011019
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Residuals, Right Knee Strain 5299-5262 10% 20011019
Not Service-Connected x 2
Combined: 10%
Combined: 20%


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority, as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of the Disability Evaluation System fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. The Board utilizes VA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability and fitness implications at the time of separation.

Right Thigh Liposarcoma Condition. The CI underwent surgical removal of a 6.5cm right upper medial thigh myxoid liposarcoma in August 1999, followed by radiation therapy to the medial aspect of his right thigh. When pathology after an initial excision of a 5cm to 6cm mass revealed a liposarcoma, a wide excision was performed and a 12cm by 6cm by 4cm specimen was removed from the CI’s right thigh. A third surgery was performed in September 1999 to insert a surgical drain into a post-operative seroma. Radiation therapy was completed in January 2000. A magnetic resonance imaging in April 2000 noted changes secondary to the radiation therapy but no evidence of neoplasm recurrence. The CI was noted to have right inguinal adenopathy in September 2000 but biopsy revealed no evidence of disease. A MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) was completed by oncology approximately 6 months prior to separation. The physical examination noted a single right inguinal lymph node, skin hyperpigmentation consistent with previous radiation therapy, well-healed incision without mass in the tumor bed, and a soft tissue defect the size of a football in the right thigh. The examiner opined the CI had “somewhat limited strength and range-of-motion in the right lower extremity” that led to a “decrease in his physical performance and a decrease in his exercise tolerance.” He also opined that it would not be possible to restore the functional loss, as there were no treatments that can replace his lost muscle mass or reverse the effects of radiation. There was no evidence of any recurrence of disease. An MEB NARSUM addendum was completed by orthopedics 3 months prior to separation. The CI reported weakness that affected walking and any attempts at running; pain in the right thigh; and numbness in the medial right thigh and medial aspect of the right leg. The exam noted muscle strength of 4/5 in the right quadriceps, adduction, and hamstring; decreased light touch sensation in the distribution of the right femoral nerve, including the right medial thigh and medial aspect of the right lower extremity down to the level of the ankle; and indurated skin consistent with radiation therapy. The examiner opined the CI’s irreversible functional loss was due to a radiation induced femoral nerve palsy and surgical removal of the adductor muscles of the thigh. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam a month prior to separation, the CI reported pain and weakness in the right leg. The examiner documented a 20 cm large scar over the medial aspect of the right thigh with “significant underlying tissue defect.” The examiner noted that there was no limited function of standing and walking and no use of supportive devices. Physical exam revealed a normal gait and normal neurologic exam. However, the examiner did not specifically state which muscles and areas of skin were assessed and made general statements that sensation and motor strength were normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the right thigh liposarcoma condition with three codes: 5012 (bones, new growths of, malignant), 8526 (femoral nerve paralysis), and 5314 (pelvic girdle and thigh, Group XIV, moderate) at 10%. The PEB Joint Disability Evaluation Tracking System form notes the CI’s permanent weakness, numbness, and pain and one PEB member noted the CI was “severely limited in his duties as a marine.” The VA rated the condition analogous to 7818 (malignant skin neoplasms) and assigned a 10% rating. No specific rationale for using this VASRD code is provided but the VA stated a rating greater than the 10% rating assigned by the PEB was not warranted without any scar tenderness, constant exudation, or itching. The record does not contain evidence of skin breakdown, ulceration, or constitutional symptoms. None of the examiners commented on limitation of function or on physical impairment in relation to the scar. The Board determined that the CI’s scar was not directly related to the CI’s functional impairment at time of separation. Therefore, rating with this code is not recommended either for the CI’s overall condition or as an additional rating. Liposarcoma is a fatty tumor and there is no VASRD code for this type of malignancy. The PEB used 5012, the code for bone cancer and the VA used 7818, the code for skin cancer; neither is technically correct but one should be included in the rating scheme to document that the tumor was the source of the CI’s functional limitation.

The Board considered the CI’s neurologic and muscular impairments, realizing that disability from injuries to the muscles and nerves, may overlap to a great extent and that IAW VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding) the evaluation of the same manifestation under different diagnoses are to be avoided. Additionally, VASRD §4.55 (principles of combined ratings for muscle injuries) states that a muscle injury rating will not be combined with a peripheral nerve paralysis rating of the same body part, unless the injuries affect entirely different functions. In this case, the CI had weakness, numbness, and pain. While a large portion of his adductor muscle was removed, he also had weakness in his hip flexor and extensor muscles on the MEB NARSUM exam and this was most likely due to the effects of radiation on the femoral nerve. Therefore, the Board determined the use of the rating criteria for 8526 (femoral nerve, incomplete paralysis) was most appropriate. While both the service and VA examinations were completed prior to separation, the VA examination appears to be less complete with only general statements about the muscle strength and cutaneous sensation examinations that lack specific data for right lower extremity. Therefore, greater probative value is assigned to the exam documented in the MEB NARSUM addendum, as it is more complete. This exam documented 4/5 muscle strength in the right hip flexion, adduction, and extension and decreased light touch sensation in the distribution of the right femoral nerve. The CI reported symptoms with walking and any attempts at running. The presence of symptoms with activities with a lower level of exertion (walking) in addition to activities that are more strenuous supports a finding of moderate incomplete paralysis of the femoral nerve and a disability rating of 20%. While all Board members agreed use of 8526 was most appropriate, the Board also considered rating with 5314 (Group IV muscles) which includes the muscles affected. However, the record contained no evidence of “debridement, prolonged infection, or sloughing of soft parts, and intermuscular scarring” and therefore, this rating scheme did not result in a rating higher than 10% for moderate muscle disability. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding) the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the right thigh liposarcoma condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right thigh liposarcoma condition, the Board, by a vote of 2:1, recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 8526-5314 IAW VASRD §4.124a. The single voter for dissent (who recommended no recharacterization) did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.




RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
Right Thigh Liposarcoma 8526-5314 20%
COMBINED
20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120630, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record




         xx
        
Director of Operations
         Physical Disability Board of Review



MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
                  COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
                                         
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) PDBR ltr dtd 28 May 13 ICO
(c) PDBR ltr dtd 22 May 13 ICO
(d) PDBR ltr dtd 22 May 13 ICO
(e) PDBR ltr dtd 17 May 13 ICO
(f) PDBR ltr dtd 10 May 13 ICO
(g) PDBR ltr dtd 17 May 13 ICO

1. Pursuant to reference (a), I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (g).
        
2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a.
former USN : Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20% (increased from 10%) effective 1 March 2003.

b.
former USN : Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20% (increased from 10%) effective 15 September 2002.

c.
former USMC : Disability retirement with a final disability rating of 40% (increased from 20%) and placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List effective 14 January 2004.

d.
former USN : Disability retirement with a final disability rating of 30% (increased from 20%) and placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List effective 15 November 2002.

e.
former USMC : Disability retirement with a final disability rating of 30% (increased from 20%) and placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List effective 31 August 2005.

f.
former USMC : Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20% (increased from 10%) effective 15 November 2001.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken, included the recoupment of disability severance pay if warranted, to implement these decisions and that subject members are notified once those actions are completed.



                                                      xx
                                                      Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01798

    Original file (PD-2013-01798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The General Surgeon noted the shrapnel wounds were healing well and a Physical Medicine Specialist documented right anterolateral thigh numbness, sharp pain, and weakness. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00502

    Original file (PD2011-00502.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the GSW to the right thigh condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The VA rated this exam as 5314 at 30%. The crucial difference in rating was the selection of disability codes; the military coded the CI’s thigh GSW based on a knee ROM disability code of 5261 for non-compensable decreased knee extension; however, the VA rated the CI under disability code 5314 for muscle injury.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00099

    Original file (PD2010-00099.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was found to have injuries mainly to his legs, more severe on the right than the left leg; however, the left leg still sustained IED injury. The Board determined therefore that neither tinnitus nor the right elbow condition was subject to service disability rating. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00735

    Original file (PD2010-00735.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA exam, one month prior to separation noted residual scar symptoms of the left hand to include itching and burning. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00942

    Original file (PD-2012-00942.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence supporting any organic changes to the nerve is the decreased sensation in the distribution of the femoral nerve. Although the Board recognizes that VASRD code 8626 is a better fit for the actual disability present, there is no benefit to the CI in changing the code, as the Board’s final rating recommendation would be the same as the 20% rating adjudicated by the PEB. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXX,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00497

    Original file (PD2009-00497.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was separated with a 10% disability rating determined by the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The VA diagnoses included: Focal atrophy of the vastus medialis muscle, minimal; right femur fracture requiring open reduction internal fixation, retrograde insertion of rod; anesthesia of strip below the knee medial aspect from the medial knee to the medial ankle, approximately two inches wide, decreased pin...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00973

    Original file (PD-2014-00973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He underwent extensive therapy toinclude rehabilitation and pain management and still had persistent left groin painwithradiation into his left leg and knee. The 20% rating for the incomplete paralysis of the femoral nerve is the highest rating available under VASRD guidelines. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | pd2009-00563

    Original file (pd2009-00563.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record. I recommend coding and rating 8599-8520 at 40% as an accurate rating of the CI's left lower extremity disability.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00790

    Original file (PD2011-00790.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Thigh Muscle Condition . All members agreed that the thigh muscle injury and open comminuted fracture of the femur with IM rod and nails was an integral part of the CI’s injury and disability that rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS; and, accordingly merits a separate service rating. Painful Thigh Scars Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02161

    Original file (PD-2013-02161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Low Back Pain Condition .The CI experienced chronic low back pain that radiated into the right leg. The VA C&P examination noted a somewhat weakened hamstring muscle but lower extremity strength was otherwise normal and gait was normal.The Board also noted that the hamstring muscle is innervated by multiple spinal nerve roots L5, S1, S2 and S3 so significant weakness from a single nerve root is not expected. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of...